Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

INFOTECH (Journal Of Technology Information) STMIK Widuri is a scientific journal
which contains research results written by lecturers, researchers, and practitioners
who has competence in Information Technology.
Information Systems
Decision Support System
Computer network
Artificial Intelligence System
Multimedia and Animation
Data Mining
Image processing
Big Data
Internet Thing Information
Software engineering

Journal of Infotech STMIK Widuri has a goal to disseminate knowledge from research results
and thoughts for the wider community, the Infotech Journal website STMIK Widuri provides journal articles for
free download.

 

Section Policies

Artikel

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Each incoming script will be notified of the editor within a week and will be done a double-blind review in 3 to 4 weeks after receipt.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides direct open access to its content based on the principle that making research is available to the public in order to support greater global knowledge exchange.

 

Publication Ethics

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Hasil gambar untuk committee on publication ethics logo

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper

 

Subscribe Policy

Infotech is a scientific journal open access so that there is no charge (free charge) to the reader, author, and access full text information on the site of the journal

 

References Management

Every article received and published in this journal is recommended using the Mendeley Reference Manager application.

 

Plagiarism Checker

Every article received and published in this journal, certainly does not contain elements of plagiarism. Check the plagiarism of each journal article using turnitin application

 

Publication Charges

Every article submitted to this journal does not have any cost withdrawal to the author. This is true since the author submits, pee-review, editing, publication, archiving, to access full text articles to journal sites.

 

Publication Frequency

Infotech is published twice a year, precisely in June and November.

 

Reviewer/Editor Join

Prospective reviewers/editors should have an interest in the interest and passion for improving the quality of journals, and having competence in accordance with the scope of scientific journals. Prospective reviewer/editor contacts the editorial secretariat for registration on the journal website. In this case, the potential reviewer should fill out the Form Call For Reviewer and the candidate editor fill out the Form Call For Editor as the data of the role of the user in the journal site. As proof of the paper and its competence, the prospective reviewer/editor must provide the link address or URL of a scientific site, such as Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Orcid, Scopus, and so on.

 

Focus and Scope

INFOTECH (Journal Of Technology Information) STMIK Widuri is a scientific journal
which contains research results written by lecturers, researchers, and practitioners
who has competence in Information Technology.
Information Systems
Decision Support System
Computer network
Artificial Intelligence System
Multimedia and Animation
Data Mining
Image processing
Big Data
Internet Thing Information
Software engineering

Journal of Infotech STMIK Widuri has a goal to disseminate knowledge from research results
and thoughts for the wider community, the Infotech Journal website STMIK Widuri provides journal articles for
free download.

 

Author Guideline

General Author Guidelines
The Manuscript should be written in Indonesian or English and have never been published or is not in the process of submission for publication to other media and does not contain elements of plagiarism.
The Manuscript may take the form of research, case studies, or literary studies.
The author should register as an author. The guides to register and submit the paper is at the bottom.
The Manuscript will publish in Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya after being reviewed by peer reviewers.
The Manuscript should be prepared according to the following author guidelines and Template. The writing template can be downloaded here.
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Structure of the manuscripts
Title. The title should be short, bright, and informative, but does not exceed 12 words. It has to be pinpoint with the issues discussed. The article title does not contain any uncommon abbreviation. The main ideas should be written first and followed then by its explanations.
Author’s names and institutions. The author's names should be accompanied by the author's institutions, institutions address, and email addresses, without any academic titles and job title.
Abstract. Abstracts are written in Indonesian and English. Abstract is made in one paragraph which consists of the background, objective, research methods, results, conclusions and keywords (3-5 phrases).
Introduction. The introduction must contain (shortly and consecutively) a general background and a literature review (state of the art), the main research problems and research method. In the final part of the introduction, the purpose of the article writing should be stated.
Result and Discussion. This part consists of the research results and how they are discussed. The results obtained from the research have to be supported by sufficient data. The research results and the discovery must be the answers, or the research hypothesis stated previously in the introduction part. The following components should be covered in the discussion: How do your results relate to the original question or objectives outlined in the Introduction section (what/how)? Do you provide interpretation scientifically for each of your results or findings presented (why)? Are your results consistent with what other investigators have reported (what else)? Or are there any differences?
Conclusions. Conclusion should answer the objectives of the research and the research discoveries. The concluding remark should not contain only the repetition of the results and discussions or abstract. You should also suggest future research and point out those that are underway.
References. The literature listed in the References contains only the sources referenced or included in the article. Please use Reference Manager Applications like EndNote, Mendeley, Zotero, etc. Referral sources should provide 80% of journal articles, proceedings, or research results from the last five years. Writing techniques bibliography, using the system cites Chicago Manual of Style 16th edition (full note, no ibid).

Examples of Footnotes and References can be found on the page download.